In the realm of sex crimes, child pornography and exploitation are particularly sensitive areas. Extreme sentencing variances in federal court rulings over the past several years have brought even more attention to these cases than they already customarily receive, and the United States Justice Department ("DOJ") is now seeking a re-visiting of sentencing guidelines and outcomes in the area.
The reason has to do with respect, specifically respect for federal courts, which a recent Justice Department report says may be diminishing because of a spreading view that the sentence received in a given case often owes predominantly - if not solely - to mere luck or lack of luck in getting a certain judge. In other words, whether a defendant gets probation or 10 years can depend more upon a judge's personal views and predilections than on any rational sentencing guidelines. There is a huge discrepancy in sentencing outcomes for what are arguably similar crimes, a sense of "arbitrariness" at work in the courts that the DOJ says is undermining the reputation of the federal courts and damaging their credibility.
